Here’s a jaw-dropping twist in the ongoing saga of the Federal Reserve: President Trump’s attempts to reshape the Fed to his liking may have spectacularly backfired, potentially leaving Jerome Powell in the chairman’s seat longer than expected, while his most loyal ally, Stephen Miran, steps down from his White House role. But here’s where it gets controversial: Could Trump’s aggressive tactics—including personal attacks, legal threats, and criminal investigations—have inadvertently cemented Powell’s position while weakening his own influence over the Fed? Let’s dive in.
Since launching his presidential campaign, Trump has repeatedly targeted Powell, often through public insults and demands. Initially, he pressured Powell to keep interest rates high to undermine President Biden’s economic approval. But once in office, Trump flipped the script, pushing for lower rates and going to extraordinary lengths to control monetary policy. His efforts included legal threats and even criminal investigations against Fed officials—moves that now seem to be blowing up in his face.
Last week, Trump appeared to score a win by identifying Kevin Warsh, a former Fed governor under Ben Bernanke, as a potential replacement for Powell (whose term ends in May). Warsh’s hawkish stance on the Fed’s balance sheet didn’t rattle markets, but his nomination hit a major roadblock: Senate Democrats refuse to proceed until Trump’s administration drops its criminal investigations into Powell and Fed Governor Lisa Cook. And this is the part most people miss: These investigations, which many view as politically motivated, are now boomeranging, potentially extending Powell’s tenure and undermining Trump’s credibility.
In a bold statement, Senate Democrats demanded, “We demand that you delay any nomination proceedings for Mr. Warsh until after the pretextual criminal investigations involving Chair Powell and Governor [Lisa] Cook have been closed.” This standoff highlights the Fed’s legal mandate for political independence, which Trump’s actions appear to flout. Meanwhile, Powell and Cook remain under investigation—Powell for testimony about Fed building renovations and Cook for mortgage-related allegations she denies. The U.S. Supreme Court has already blocked Trump’s attempt to remove Cook, further complicating his Fed takeover plans.
UBS chief economist Paul Donovan notes that unless Trump drops these investigations, Powell could remain as Fed chair beyond May. Meanwhile, Stephen Miran, Trump’s key ally who served both on the Fed and as chairman of the Council of Economic Advisers (CEA), has resigned from his White House post. While Miran’s future at the Fed remains uncertain, his departure publicly distances the White House from the Fed—a move that, ironically, aligns with the Fed’s independence mandate.
Here’s the burning question: Did Trump’s heavy-handed approach to controlling the Fed ultimately strengthen Powell’s position while eroding his own influence? And what does this mean for the future of monetary policy and the Fed’s independence? Share your thoughts in the comments—this debate is far from over.
Join us at the Fortune Workplace Innovation Summit on May 19–20, 2026, in Atlanta, where global leaders will explore how AI, humanity, and strategy are reshaping the future of work. Register now to be part of this transformative event!
