The Miss Universe Misstep: When Appreciation Turns to Appropriation
Let’s start with a question: When does cultural appreciation cross the line into appropriation? This isn’t just a semantic debate—it’s a question that’s been thrust into the spotlight after two Miss Universe Canada contestants donned Indigenous-style costumes, sparking outrage and apologies. Personally, I think this incident is a microcosm of a much larger issue: our collective struggle to navigate cultural boundaries in an increasingly globalized world.
The Outfits That Broke the Internet
During the national costume segment, Karisa Haverkamp and Jasleen Kaily stepped onto the stage in outfits that, on the surface, seemed like tributes to Indigenous cultures. Haverkamp wore a feathered headdress and a painted red hand—a symbol of solidarity with the Missing and Murdered Indigenous Women movement. Kaily opted for a fur dress and boots, dubbed ‘Arctic Beauty.’ On paper, these choices might seem respectful, even celebratory. But here’s the thing: context matters.
What makes this particularly fascinating is the disconnect between intention and impact. Both contestants claimed they meant to honor Indigenous cultures, but their actions were met with criticism rather than applause. In my opinion, this highlights a common misconception: good intentions don’t automatically exempt you from causing harm. Cultural appreciation isn’t just about the gesture—it’s about understanding the weight of what you’re representing.
The Backlash and the Apologies
The backlash was swift. Ashley Callingbull, Miss Universe Canada 2014 and the pageant’s first First Nations winner, called the costumes ‘cultural appropriation.’ Her reaction was visceral: ‘My jaw dropped on the floor,’ she told CBS Indigenous. ‘Who allowed this on stage? Who approved this?’ Her outrage wasn’t just about the outfits themselves but about the systemic oversight that let them happen.
Both contestants issued apologies, with Haverkamp acknowledging the hurt caused and Kaily admitting she didn’t fully understand the implications of her costume. But here’s where it gets tricky: apologies are necessary, but they’re not enough. What this really suggests is that we need a deeper conversation about cultural literacy and the power dynamics at play.
Why This Matters Beyond the Pageant Stage
If you take a step back and think about it, this incident isn’t just about a beauty pageant gone wrong. It’s about the broader issue of who gets to tell whose stories. Indigenous cultures have historically been marginalized, exploited, and erased. When non-Indigenous people co-opt their symbols without understanding or permission, it perpetuates that cycle of erasure.
One thing that immediately stands out is how often cultural appropriation is framed as a ‘mistake’ rather than a symptom of systemic ignorance. From my perspective, this is where the real work needs to happen. We need to move beyond performative apologies and start educating ourselves about the histories and struggles of the cultures we claim to admire.
The Role of Institutions
What many people don’t realize is that institutions like Miss Universe play a significant role in shaping these narratives. The pageant’s statement acknowledged the offense but stopped short of taking full responsibility. This raises a deeper question: Shouldn’t organizations with such visibility be held to a higher standard?
A detail that I find especially interesting is how the national costume segment is often framed as a celebration of diversity. But without proper oversight and consultation, it can become a platform for stereotypes and misrepresentations. If the pageant truly wants to honor different cultures, it needs to involve those cultures in the decision-making process.
Looking Ahead: Lessons and Implications
This incident isn’t just a cautionary tale—it’s a call to action. Personally, I think it’s time for all of us to reevaluate how we engage with cultures that aren’t our own. Whether it’s fashion, art, or entertainment, the question should always be: Are we amplifying voices or silencing them?
In a world where cultural exchange is inevitable, the key is to approach it with humility and respect. That means doing the work to understand the context, seeking permission when necessary, and recognizing that not every story is ours to tell.
Final Thoughts
As I reflect on this controversy, I’m reminded of a quote by author Chimamanda Ngozi Adichie: ‘Culture does not make people. People make culture.’ In this case, the people behind the costumes missed the mark, but the conversation they’ve sparked is invaluable.
What this incident really suggests is that cultural appreciation isn’t just about wearing the right outfit—it’s about wearing the right mindset. And that’s a lesson we all need to take to heart.
